|
1.
|
Clear description of the referenced document:
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Status of approval:
|
|
|
All are approved IETF documents
|
|
3.
|
Justification for the specific reference:
|
|
|
Provides information on uses of packet delay variation (PDV)
|
|
4.
|
Current information, if any, about IPR issues:
|
|
|
Information on IPR issues regarding RFCs is available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/. Specifically: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=rfc_search&rfc_search=5481
|
|
5.
|
Other useful information describing the "Quality" of the document:
|
|
|
This RFC was approved in March 2009.
|
|
6.
|
The degree of stability or maturity of the document:
|
|
|
Informational IETF Stream document approved March 2009
.
|
|
7.
|
Relationship with other existing or emerging documents:
|
|
|
This document clarifies the usage of RFC 3393.
|
|
8.
|
Any explicit references within that referenced document should also be listed:
|
|
|
12.1. Normative References/
/
/
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate/
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997./
/
[RFC2330] Paxson, V., Almes, G., Mahdavi, J., and M. Mathis,/
"Framework for IP Performance Metrics", RFC 2330,/
May 1998./
/
[RFC2679] Almes, G., Kalidindi, S., and M. Zekauskas, "A One-/
way Delay Metric for IPPM", RFC 2679,/
September 1999./
/
[RFC2680] Almes, G., Kalidindi, S., and M. Zekauskas, "A One-/
way Packet Loss Metric for IPPM", RFC 2680,/
September 1999./
/
[RFC3393] Demichelis, C. and P. Chimento, "IP Packet Delay/
Variation Metric for IP Performance Metrics/
(IPPM)", RFC 3393, November 2002./
/
[RFC3432] Raisanen, V., Grotefeld, G., and A. Morton,/
"Network performance measurement with periodic/
streams", RFC 3432, November 2002/
/
/
/
/
[RFC4090] Pan, P., Swallow, G., and A. Atlas, "Fast Reroute/
Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels", RFC 4090,/
May 2005./
/
[RFC4656] Shalunov, S., Teitelbaum, B., Karp, A., Boote, J.,/
and M. Zekauskas, "A One-way Active Measurement/
Protocol (OWAMP)", RFC 4656, September 2006./
/
[RFC4737] Morton, A., Ciavattone, L., Ramachandran, G.,/
Shalunov, S., and J. Perser, "Packet Reordering/
Metrics", RFC 4737, November 2006./
/
12.2. Informative References/
/
/
[COM12.D98] Clark, A., "Analysis, measurement and modelling of/
Jitter", ITU-T Delayed Contribution COM 12 - D98,/
January 2003./
/
[Casner] Casner, S., Alaettinoglu, C., and C. Kuan, "A Fine-/
Grained View of High Performance Networking",/
NANOG 22, May 20-22, 2001,/
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0105/agenda.html./
/
[Cia03] Ciavattone, L., Morton, A., and G. Ramachandran,/
"Standardized Active Measurements on a Tier 1 IP/
Backbone", IEEE Communications Magazine, p. 90-97,/
June 2003./
/
[Demichelis] Demichelis, C., "Packet Delay Variation Comparison/
between ITU-T and IETF Draft Definitions",/
November 2000, http://www.advanced.org/ippm//
archive.3/att-0075/01-pap02.doc./
/
[G.1020] ITU-T, "Performance parameter definitions for the/
quality of speech and other voiceband applications/
utilizing IP networks", ITU-T/
Recommendation G.1020, 2006./
/
[G.1050] ITU-T, "Network model for evaluating multimedia/
transmission performance over Internet Protocol",/
ITU-T Recommendation G.1050, November 2005./
/
[I.356] ITU-T, "B-ISDN ATM Layer Cell Transfer/
Performance", ITU-T Recommendation I.356,/
March 2000./
/
[IPPM-Framework] Morton, A., "Framework for Metric Composition",/
Work in Progress, October 2008./
/
/
/
/
[IPPM-Reporting] Morton, A., Ramachandran, G., and G. Maguluri,/
"Reporting Metrics: Different Points of View", Work/
in Progress, January 2009./
/
[IPPM-Spatial] Morton, A. and E. Stephan, "Spatial Composition of/
Metrics", Work in Progress, July 2008./
/
[Krzanowski] Presentation at IPPM, IETF-64, "Jitter Definitions:/
What is What?", November 2005./
/
[Li.Mills] Li, Q. and D. Mills, "The Implications of Short-/
Range Dependency on Delay Variation Measurement",/
Second IEEE Symposium on Network Computing/
and Applications, 2003./
/
[Morton06] Morton, A., "A Brief Jitter Metrics Comparison, and/
not the last word, by any means...", slide/
presentation at IETF 65, IPPM Session, March 2006./
/
[RFC1305] Mills, D., "Network Time Protocol (Version 3)/
Specification, Implementation", RFC 1305,/
March 1992./
/
[RFC3357] Koodli, R. and R. Ravikanth, "One-way Loss Pattern/
Sample Metrics", RFC 3357, August 2002./
/
[RFC3550] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V./
Jacobson, "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time/
Applications", STD 64, RFC 3550, July 2003./
/
[Y.1540] ITU-T, "Internet protocol data communication/
service - IP packet transfer and availability/
performance parameters", ITU-T Recommendation/
Y.1540, November 2007./
/
[Y.1541] ITU-T, "Network Performance Objectives for IP-Based/
Services", ITU-T Recommendation Y.1541,/
February 2006./
/
[Zhang.Duff] Zhang, Y., Duffield, N., Paxson, V., and S./
Shenker, "On the Constancy of Internet Path/
Properties", Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Internet/
Measurement Workshop, November 2001./
|
|
9.
|
Qualification of
ISOC/IETF:
|
|
|
9.1-9.6 Decisions of ITU Council to admit ISOC to participate in the work of the Sector (June 1995 and June 1996).
9.7 The Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) is responsible for ongoing maintenance of the RFCs when the need arises. Comments on RFCs and corresponding changes are accommodated through the existing standardization process.
9.8 Each revision of a given RFC has a different RFC number, so no confusion is possible. All RFCs always remain available on-line. An index of RFCs and their status may be found in the IETF archives at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
|
|
10.
|
Other (for any supplementary information):
|
|
|
None
|
|
